[saymaListserv] Fwd: Re: Fw: Social Security
Janet Minshall
jhminshall at comcast.net
Wed Jan 18 15:29:37 EST 2006
Dear Friends, Daryl Bergquist and one of my sons have written to say that
Snopes.com (urban legends) indicates that this
e-mail is not factual. I know from previous
research that the basic issues are correct, so it
may be that the numbers and /or the details are
off. In any case, I have looked at Snopes.com
(urban legends) and a couple of other resources
and found most of the info needed to correct this
message:
The reality is that members of Congress
do,indeed, pay into Social Security, but it is
also true that they have both a separate federal
worker's pension system and an annuity trust as
retirement benefits in addition to the Social
Security benefits for which they are eligible.
The Amount of Social Security they receive
reduces by the same amount their government
pension amount, but it does not in any way affect
their annuity trust payouts. The total payout can
easily amount to more than a million dollars if
they serve in Congress as young persons and have
a normal life span.
As Dilbert author/artist Scott Adams indicates in
a quote shown below, the average salary /pension
collected by members of Congress in 1996 (ten
years ago) was a "modest" $40,000, and the
average annuity paid out was $47 to $50,000 a
year plus cost of living adjustments and
additions related to length of service per year.
Adams says that this is "about two to three times
the amount of pension collected by the average
worker".
The average Social Security Disability/ Retirement payment is $800 a month
($9,600 a year). It is also increased by annual
cost of living adjustments, but it is then
REDUCED by the constantly rising cost of Medicare
coverage which is automatically deducted. For
example my Social Security payment amounts to
$907.50 AFTER being raised to reflect the COLA of
4.1% It is then REDUCED by $88.50 PER MONTH to
pay for my Medicare benefits so I end up with
$819 a month to live on. My disabled son
receives the same amount. I invite you all to
find a place to live, pay for heat and light, buy
enough food to eat and have the necessary towels,
blankets, household and toiletry items AND live
close enough to the doctors and hospitals you
depend on for healthcare, AND pay the amount
required to fill your prescriptions each month.
(I just had a $200 bill for prescription
medications this month) It is just not possible
to live on that amount unless you are partially
supported by family. Many disabled and retired
people no longer have any family. THEY are the
majority of the people who are homeless and out
on the streets of Atlanta and every other major
city and town in the US. The real point of that
e-mailed message I sent out was that if the
members of Congress had to live on what Social
Security retirees live on they would fix the
Social Security system. That premise still holds
and is actually strengthened by the queries of
people who just don't want to believe it is so.
Janet Minshall
from Snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp:
It is not true that Congressmen do not
pay into the Social Security fund. Since 1984
they have paid into the fund just as most
everyone else does. (A few odd exceptions to the
Social Security program still exist, both inside
and outside of government, but not for members of
Congress.)
* It was true prior to 1984 that
Congressmen did not pay into the Social Security
fund because they participated in a separate
program for civil servants (the Civil Service
Retirement System, or CSRS), but that program was
closed to government employees hired after 1983:
In 1983, Public Law 98-21 required Social
Security coverage for federal civilian employees
first hired after 1983 and closed the Civil
Service Retirement System (CSRS) to new federal
employees and Members of Congress. All incumbent
Members of Congress were required to be covered
by Social Security, regardless of when they
entered Congress. Members who had participated in
CSRS before 1984 could elect to stay in that plan
in addition to being covered by Social Security
or elect coverage under an 'offset plan' that
integrates CSRS and Social Security. Under the
CSRS Offset Plan, an individual's contributions
to CSRS and their pension benefits from that plan
are reduced ('offset') by the amount of their
contributions to, and benefits from, Social
Security.
* It is not true that Congressmen "continue
to draw their same pay, until they die." The size
of their pensions is determined by a number of
factors (primarily length of service, but also
factors such as when they joined Congress, their
age at retirement, their salary, and the pension
options they chose when they enrolled in the
retirement system) and by law cannot exceed 80%
of their salary at the time of their retirement.
* It is not true that Congressmen "paid
nothing in on any kind of retirement," and that
their pension money "comes right out of the
General Fund." Whether members of Congress
participate in the older Civil Service Retirement
System or the newer Federal Employees' Retirement
System (FERS), their pensions are funded through
a combination of general tax provisions and
contributions from the participants. Right now,
members of Congress in the FERS plan must pay
1.3% of their salary to FERS and 6.2% in Social
Security taxes.
It
Shinola Suggests...
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without ...
Malcolm Gladwell
Drawing on cutting-edge neuroscience and
psychology, the author shows how the difference
between good decision-making and bad has nothing
to do with how much information that ...
Dilbert: I Love My Coworkers until They ...
Scott Adams
Scott Adams is a native of New York State and a
veteran of Corporate America's banking and
technology sectors. He created Dilbert as a
doodle while working for Pacific Bell and began
... is true that, if current pension levels and
cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for Congress
members continue to apply in the future, some
former members of Congress could conceivably
collect millions of dollars in annuities over the
course of their lifetimes. However, the huge
dollar amounts bandied about in e-mails like the
ones quoted above are based upon extreme cases:
those of politicians who entered Congress at a
relatively early age, served for several decades,
and retired while still young enough to
potentially live for another several decades.
These cases are the rare exceptions, based upon
the hypothetical assumption that a few
long-serving members of Congress who retired
while in their mid-50s will live well past the
age of 80. (Even the person who collects a modest
salary/pension of $40,000 per year stands to take
in a million dollars over the course of 25 years.)
As of 1998, the average annuity for retired
members of Congress was $50,616 for those who
retired under CSRS and $46,908 for those who
retired under FERS. Those figures are quite good
(about 2-3 times better than the pension
collected by the average worker), but not quite
the highway robbery these e-mails make them out
to be.
Additional information:
Congressional Pensions
(C-SPAN)
Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress
(United States Senate)
Do Members of Congress Pay Social Security Taxes?
(National Taxpayers' Union)Last updated: 21 February 2005
The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp
Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2006
by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson
Hi Daryl, I'll be happy to correct it. In fact,
I'm going to do some research to make any
corrections necessary. It will take a few days
but I plan to do it as quickly as I can. Janet
According to snopes (urban legends) website this article is not factual. Daryl
<http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp>http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp
Janet Minshall wrote:
Fwd: Re: Fw: Social Security
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kitenet.net/pipermail/sayma/attachments/20060118/e2e2befb/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the sayma
mailing list