[saymaListserv] List-server "reply-to" options

Kendall Ivie IvieK at ispchannel.com
Tue May 23 10:28:36 JEST 2000

Kathleen speaks my mind on this.

When I hit reply my software put in Kathleen's email address.  I then
deleted her address and typed in the listserver's address.  If I am not
paying attention I will forget to take these steps and reply to directly to
the sender when I intend to post to the sayma listserver.  The default
should be for a reply to go to the listserver.

Kendall Ivie
West Knoxville
IvieK at ispchannel.com

-----Original Message-----
From: sayma-admin at kitenet.net [mailto:sayma-admin at kitenet.net]On Behalf
Of Kathleen H. Mavournin
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 10:03 AM
To: SAYMA at kitenet.net
Subject: Re: [saymaListserv] List-server "reply-to" options

> I went to the admin portion of the list-server website, and it appears
> that there might be a good reason for directing replies to the original
> poster of a message:  replies to the poster "are _strongly_ recommended.
> There are many reasons not to introduce headers like reply-to into other
> people's messages -- one is that some posters depend on their own
> reply-to setting to convey their valid email address.

This part means that some people don't put their email address in the
body of the message and rely on the REPLY-TO section of the message
headers to let people find it. However, email software that shows the
headers at all will almost always show the FROM section of the headers
as well, and the sender's email address is there.

If it becomes a problem, the SAYMA list is a small and stable enough
that I think we could learn to sign messages with our email addresses as
well as our names and teach new subscribers to do the same. It's more
important in my view to encourage open communication by having replies
go to the entire list by default.

Kathleen Mavournin
kmav at icx.net

Southern Appalachian Yearly Meeting and Association mailing list
sayma at kitenet.net

More information about the sayma mailing list