[saymaListserv] Fwd: Should Peace Movements Criticize Terrorism??

Free Polazzo freepolazzo at mindspring.com
Sun Jun 10 22:34:04 JEST 2001

Dear Friends,

At this past weekend's yearly meeting, there was a minute introduced by 
Crossville to encourage us to
ask the US Government to stop sending weapons and the 6 Billion Dollars 
each year to Isreal.  We don't need
to wait another year for the MM and YM to "season" this concern.   This is 
a very real and current crisis.  Friends
need to have their voices heard. . .. now not in June 2002!

Please read the messages from Ilise Cohen, of our AFSC SERO office's Middle 
East Peace Education Office, and the
message she sent to me from Rabbi Arther Waskow.

They will explain, very clearly, what is happening and why we need to 
act.   Friends's voices carry far when they speak out.
Please consider this issue as one critical importance.

Each of you can make a difference.   Let your voices be heard.


Free Polazzo,
Anneewakee Creek WG (GA)

>From: Ilisec at aol.com
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:06:43 EDT
>Subject: Should Peace Movements Criticize Terrorism??
>To: Ilisec at aol.com
>X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120
>Dear Friends,
>AFSC as a nonviolent organization condemns all acts of violence, both by the
>Israelis and Palestinians. We are supporting vigils across the country to end
>the occupation along with many women in black groups and other peace and
>justice groups that are working/struggling for a genuine and lasting peace
>between both peoples. The last few months have been extremely difficult for
>people on the ground. Please support the end to all violence, state or
>inidividual, and support the freedom, rights, dignity and livelihood of
>Palestinians and Israelis.
>In Peace,
>Ilise Cohen
>Dear Friends,
>For the last several months, there has been an important debate going on in
>semi-private among various organizers of the emerging and rebirthing
>movements, Jewish and otherwise, for a just peace in the Middle East..
>The debate has included disagreement over whether those movements should
>criticize the violence that is being used by some Palestinians, including
>terrorist attacks on unarmed civilians,  as well as criticizing the violence
>inherent in the Israeli occupation of the proto-Palestine of the West Bank,
>Gaza, and the Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem.
>In the wake of the Tel Aviv terrorist bombing, and as we are on the verge of
>the June 8 world-wide vigils against the occupation, I think this debate
>needs to be public.
>My own position (and that of Break the Silence, as expressed in one of the
>points of our OLIVE TREES FOR PEACE statement) is that a movement for peace
>and justice needs to criticize violence by Palestinians, especially
>terrorism, and to urge all Palestinians to heed those Palestinian voices that
>are calling for the use of vigorous nonviolent resistance to the occupation,
>instead of violence.
>Before explaining my own views, let me first give as adequate an account as I
>can of the arguments of those who oppose doing this, or who mute the
>criticism of Palestinian violence almost beneath audibility.
>The main argument is that the relationship between Israel and Palestine is
>not symmetrical.  Israel has overwhelming power and is using it:
> Israel has cut the Palestinian territories into small enclaves, separated
>by corridors of Israeli settlements and soldiers and military checkpoints.
> Israel is besieging and blockading Palestinian towns and villages.
> Israel has shattered the Palestinian economy, shuttered many of its schools.
>None of these is true in reverse: Israel is not under occupation, siege, or
>blockade, its schools are open and its economy is working, there are no armed
>Palestinian settlers swaggering down Israeli streets, forcing curfews on
>Israeli towns, etc.
>As facts, I think all of this is accurate.
>And I think this situation is unjust, and anti-peace, and deserves to be
>criticized, protested, and (nonviolently) resisted, by Palestinians, by Jews,
>and by anyone else.  We need to say that ending the occupation and the
>extra-territorial Israeli settlements will not only serve justice and peace,
>but will save Israeli lives  the lives of soldiers and settlers  as well
>as Palestinian lives.
>The question is whether this asymmetry justifies terrorism, and whether it
>requires silence about terrorism from a movement for peace and justice.
>I think not. And I think it is legitimate for me, and people who agree with
>me, to insist that actions against the Israeli occupation (like the June 8
>vigils) also speak out against Palestinian terrorism, at the same time making
>clear that the power relationship between the people is not symmetrical.
>Why do I think this?
>First , because from every ethical standpoint the murder of unarmed civilians
>is vile.
>I have been told that ethics is a world different from politics, and that
>from a political standpoint one should focus on the asymmetry of power and
>not address the ethical vileness of this terrorism.
>But there are two things wrong with this view:
>1. I think we all have seen that a politics that is severed from ethics
>becomes an unethical, anti-ethical, brutal, destructive, dehumanizing,
>tyrannical politics.
>As Martin Buber wrote in "Recollection of a Death" (in Pointing the Way, p.
>"I cannot conceive of anything real corresponding to the saying that 'the end
>'sanctifies' the means; but I mean something which is real in the highest
>sense of the term when I say that the means profane, actually make
>meaningless, the end, that is, its realization!
>"What is realized is the farther from the goal that was set, the more out of
>accord with it is the method by which it was realized."
>Buber was writing this in 1921 or thereabouts, in regard to the Leninist use
>of the "Red Terror."
>AND  it applies with great power today, to both Israel and the nascent
>Palestine.  The use by either of them of terror, torture, bombings,
>demolition of homes, sieges, assassinations, etc becomes part of the fabric
>of the society.
>Those who are committed to a Jewish state, to a free Palestine, to a just and
>peaceful world, should condemn such actions for what they create politically,
>as well as for their ethical corruption.
>2. Terrorism is itself a political act.
>Read this from Uri Avneri, one of the most stalwart of Israelis committed to
>peace and justice, an opponent of the occupation from practically the instant
>of its beginning in 1967:
>"When the al-Aksa intifada broke out and many Palestinians withdrew from open
>contacts with Israelis, Faisal [Husseini] did not retreat one step.
>"We met several times at the Orient House and we held a big public meeting
>there. A week before his death he suddenly appeared, without prior notice, at
>an Israel-Palestinian press conference for the international press, in which
>we expressed our unshakable belief in peace between the two peoples.
>"This spirit was prevalent at yesterdays funeral, too. The few Israelis who
>came to tender their condolences were received with open arms in the
>courtyard where thousands were crammed, hundreds came to shake our hands. One
>of the Israelis was invited to speak.
>"In my heart I treated Faisal as a brother. For me, the frontline does not
>pass between Israelis and Palestinians, but between the Israeli and
>Palestinian peace lovers on one side and the war-mongers of both peoples on
>the other.
>"Less than six hours after the Palestinian people united around Faisals
>coffin, the war camp hit back.
>"The suicide bomber who blew himself up among the boys and girls at the
>Dophinarium discotheque on the sea-shore of Tel-Aviv did a great service to
>the settlers, who are trying to convince the Israeli public that it is not
>because of them that the rivers of blood are flowing and that there is no
>difference between the settlements and Tel-Aviv.
>"The collaboration between the Islamic fanatics and the extreme right-wing in
>Israel is a fact of life, as is the cooperation between the likes of Faisal
>and the Israeli peace activists.
>"The Israeli government does not belong  to put it mildly - to the peace
>front. If not stopped by international forces, it will choose escalation. In
>the ping-pong game between Rehavam Zeevi and Sheikh Yassin, Hizbullah and
>the settlers, the ball is a human skull.
>"The heart of Faisal Husseini stopped beating when we need him more than
>ever. "
>Then why should a movement for peace and justice refrain from condemning a
>political act that is vile in its ethics and destructive in its politics? An
>article  by Henry Lowi (excerpt just below) makes this same point even more
>colorfully.  As Lowi wrote:
>". . .those who sent [ the Tel Aviv bomber] should be branded as criminals to
>the cause of a Free Palestine.
>"There is no need to remind readers that, among Tel Aviv discotheque
>revellers one can find opponents of the occupation, enemies of Zionism, army
>resisters and deserters, and just plain folks who want to escape from the
>madness and relax.
>By targetting them, what message does one send?  Does one send a message of
>despair; i.e. look at how desperate I am, understand me, sympathize with me,
>embrace me?
>"No way. One sends the following message:
>"Wherever you are, whatever you are doing, we will get you. Our enemy is not
>the settlers. Our enemy is not the army. Our enemy is not racism. Our enemy
>is not colonialism.  Our enemy is you, wherever you are, and whatever you are
>"This is exactly the message that Sharon, and Katzav, and their allies, and
>their predecessors, want Israelis to get. . . . The media spin, in support of
>Israeli violence against Palestinians, has now received an amazing boost. The
>spin will clearly be that the Israelis are the victims of Palestinian racist
>"Thus, the beneficiaries of Palestinian suicide bombings are not the Palest
>inian people, but the Israeli racists."
>This leaves a question: If we oppose and criticize terrorism, what can we say
>about how to prevent it?
>The official answer of the Israeli government has been  with more violence.
>But we have already seen that draconic blockades, sieges, bombings, etc. etc.
>  all fail to stop such vile actions as the Tel Aviv bombing.
>Given that all life is a gamble,  how?
>It seems to me that what would ENHANCE the chances of stopping terrorism
>--without a guarantee -- -- is a serious peace, because it would redirect
>energy into society-building instead of rage and hatred.  (But it might for a
>brief period also bring  about a burst of terrorist attempts just as
>agreement is near, as has happened in the past, for the precise purpose of
>preventing agreement.)
>And within its own boundaries, Israel would certainly be correct in taking
>the measures any state would take to prevent terrorism.
>Finally, let me repeat: I think all of us who are committed to justice, to
>peace, to the safety and freedom of Israel as well as the emerging Palestine,
>  ought to insist on incorporating this perspective into actions for peace
>including June 8.  Where we vigil and what our signs say and what message is
>given the media are important.
>Shalom, Arthur
>Rabbi Arthur Waskow, Director
>The Shalom Center
>LIST, by writing
><shalomctr1-subscribe at topica.com>
>To unsubscribe, send a blank email to:
><shalomctr1-unsubscribe at topica.com>
>To read archives of back articles or comments from this list on the Web,
>visit the following url:
><<A HREF="3D"> ">http://www.topica.com/lists/shalomctr1></A>
>To access the back files or to start your own E-list, if you are not already
>registered with Topica, complete their simple registration process.
>This is an announcement rather than a discussion list.  Please DO NOT REPLY
>to messages you receive.  Instead, to respond, please send your message to:
>responsA18 at aol.com
>I look forward to talking, wrestling, and dancing with you and through you
>with the Holy One Who is the Breath of Life.
>Rabbi Arthur Waskow
>Director, The Shalom Center. See Website <<A HREF="3D">
>Convenor, Free Time/ Free People Multi-religious Project on Overwork in
>America. See  <<A HREF="3D"> ">http://www.FreeOurTime.org></A>

Donate free food with a simple click: http://www.thehungersite.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kitenet.net/pipermail/sayma/attachments/20010610/de151bac/attachment.html>

More information about the sayma mailing list